The review of the socio-political fiction novels under binary opposition and logocentrism (case study of novel entitled "Orang-Orang Proyek" by Ahmad Tohari)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23899/relacult.v6i1.1398Palabras clave:
Deconstructive Reading Method, Irony, Binary Opposition, Logocentrism, Fiction Novel.Resumen
The socio-political fiction novel is real and presents an implicit portray of the community's social life of a dwell. This sort of literature is less prevalent because every reader might have their perception while the authors favor particular value according to their social and mental experiences. An Indonesian novel entitled "Orang-Orang Proyek" by Ahmad Tohari, which represents the real condition of the Indonesian community under their political and social situations, is a perfect portray to describe the relation between binary opposition and logocentrism. Both theories will affect the author how they describe each character, even decide how the story ends. This paper tries to break down that literary work using the deconstructive-reading method to read a text with multi-interpretation where the version contains many probabilities of meaning. This study will provide insight into the correct reading method according to the purpose and type of literacy used in literary works.
Métricas
Citas
ANDERSSON, Renée. “The myth of Sweden’s success: A deconstructive reading of the discourses in gender mainstreaming texts.” European Journal of Women’s Studies Vol 25, Issue 4, 2018, pp. 440–454.
AVENIER, Marie-José. “Les paradigmes épistémologiques constructivistes: post-modernisme ou pragmatisme?” Management & Avenir Vol 43, Issue 3, 2011, pp. 372-391.
BATES, Stanley. FISCHER, Michael. “Stanley Cavell and Literary Skepticism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol 48, No 43, 1990, pp. 239-241.
BEARDSLEY, Monroe C., BLOOM, Harold, de MAN, Paul, DERRIDA, Jacques, HARTMAN, Geoffrey, & MILLER, J. Hillis. “Deconstruction and Criticism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol 39, No 2, 1980, pp. 219-221.
BENNETT, Andrew. ROYLE, Nicholas. An Introduction to Literature, Criticism, and Theory. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2004.
BRANDT, Peter Andreas. “Grammatology.” Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd Edition, 2006, pp. 136-140.
CHAM, Karens. “The Architecture of the Image,” July 2011 - Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2011). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/eva2011.31.
CHAMBERLAIN, Leasley. “With Derrida in Oxford,” Posted on November 2nd, 2014. https://lesleychamberlain.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/with-derrida-in-oxford/ Responded on January 4th, 2015.
CHARNEY, Davida. “From logocentrism to ethocentrism: Historicizing critiques of writing research.” Technical Communication Quarterly Vol 7, Issue 1, 1998, pp. 9-32.
CLARK, Herbert H. GERRIG, Richard J. “On the pretense theory of irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol 113, No 1, 1984, pp. 121-126.
DANEMAN, Meredyth. CARPENTER, Patricia A. “Individual differences in working memory and reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior Vol 19, Issue 4, 1980, pp. 450-466.
DAY, Gail. “Allegory: Between Deconstruction and Dialectics.” Oxford Art Journal, Vol 22, Issue 1, 1999, pp. 103-118.
DERRIDA, Jacques. BLOOM, Harold. de MAN, Paul. HARTMANN, Geoffrey H. MILLER, J. Hillis. Deconstruction and Criticism. London: Continuum Intl Pub Group, 2004.
DYSON, Mary. HASELGROVE, Mark. “The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen.” Journal of Research in Reading Vol 23, Issue 2, 2000, pp. 210-223.
GRICE, Paul H. Intention and Uncertainty. The Proceedings of the British Academy Vol 57 (1971). London: THE BRITISH ACADEMY, 1973.
GRICE, Paul H. Login and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics Vol 3 (Speech Act Edition). New York: ACADEMIC PRESS, 1975)
HARDIE, Philip. MOORE, Helen. Classical literary careers and their reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
HEITSCH, Dorothea. VALLÉE, Jean- François. “Printed Voices: The Renaissance Culture of Dialogue.” Sixteenth Century Journal Vol 37, No 3, 2006, pp. 932-933.
JORGENSEN, Julia. MILLER, George A. SPERBER, Dan. “Test of the mention theory of irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol 113, Issue 1, 1984, pp. 112–120.
JUSTMAN, Stewart. “Bibliotherapy: Literature as Exploration Reconsidered.” Academic Questions Vol 23, 2010, pp. 125-135.
KERSHNER, Brandon R. Part IV - Contemporary Theory and Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
LUCARIELLO, Joan. “Situational Irony: A Concept of Events Gone Awry.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol 123, Issue 2, 1994, pp. 129-145.
LUND, Nick. Language and Thought. London: Routledge, 2003.
MA, Ruiz-Moneva. “Some Proposals to Cope with Forms of Irony Typically Found in Literary Texts from a Relevance - Theoretical Perspective.” Studies in Literature and Language Vol 2, Issue 2, 2011, pp. 127.
MARKO, Marton. History and nature in motion: Paradigms of transformation in the postwar poems of Ingeborg Bachmann. Part I - Poetics after Auschwitz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
MARTIN, Montserrat. SPENCER, Nancy. BRUCE, Toni. “Dancing with Derrida: Deconstructing sportswomen’s performances on dancing with the stars and Mira Quien Baila.” Sociology of Sport Journal Vol 35, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 178-187.
NORRIS, Christopher. “The Deconstructive Turn: Essays in the Rhetoric of Philosophy.” Poetics Today Vol. 5, No. 2, 1984, p. 444.
OSBORNE, Jonathan. SIMON, Shirley. COLLINS, Sue. “Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications.” International Journal of Science Education Vol. 25, Issue 9, 2003, pp. 1049-1079.
OSBORNE, Richard. Logocentrism. Megawords: 200 Terms You Really Need to Know. NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2001.
POLIVODA, Alina A. “Deconstruction of The Metaphysics of Presence in Phenomenology and Structuralism.” Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research No.11, 2017, pp. 33-40.
POLLETTA, Fransesca. CHEN, Pang Ching Bobby. GARDNER, Beth Gharrity. MOTES, Alice. “The Sociology of Storytelling.” Annual Review of Sociology Vol. 37, 2011, pp. 109-130.
RADFORD, Gary P. RADFORD, Marie L. “Structuralism, post-structuralism, and the library: De Saussure and Foucault.” Journal of Documentation Vol. 61, No. 1, 2005, pp. 60-78.
de SAUSSURE, Ferdinand. Cours de linguistique Générale. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
SHELLEY, Cameron. “The bicoherence theory of situational irony.” Cognitive Science Vol. 25, Issue 5, 2001, pp. 775-818.
SPERBER, Dan. “Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol. 113, Issue 1, 1984, pp. 130–136.
STOCKER, Barry. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Derrida on Deconstruction. London: Routledge, 2006.
SURYANARAYANA, T. M. V. Mistry, P. B. “Review of the literature.” Principal Component Regression for Crop Yield Estimation, 2016, pp. 27-37.
THISTLETHWAITE, Jill. JACKSON, Ann. MORAN, Monica. “Interprofessional collaborative practice: A deconstruction.” Journal of Interprofessional Care Vol. 27, Issue 1, 2013, pp. 50-56.
TRIFONAS, Peter Pericles. PETERS, Michael A. Deconstructing Derrida: Tasks for the New Humanities. Basel: Springer Nature, 2005.
TOHARI, Ahmad. Orang-Orang Proyek. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2015.
WEST, Michael. “The ‘Reading Approach’ and ‘The New Method System’.” The Modern Language Journal Vol. 22, No.3, 1937, pp. 220-222.
WILDAVSKY, Aaron. “Reading with a purpose.” Book Research Quarterly Vol.4, 1988, pp. 44-54.
WILSON, Deirdre. “Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics Vol.59, Part A, 2013, pp. 40-56
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da sua autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b) Esta revista proporciona acesso público a todo o seu conteúdo, uma vez que isso permite uma maior visibilidade e alcance dos trabalhos publicados. Para maiores informações sobre esta abordagem, visite Public Knowledge Project, projeto que desenvolveu este sistema para melhorar a qualidade acadêmica e pública da pesquisa, distribuindo o OJS assim como outros softwares de apoio ao sistema de publicação de acesso público a fontes acadêmicas. Os nomes e endereços de e-mail neste site serão usados exclusivamente para os propósitos da revista, não estando disponíveis para outros fins.